The Cost of Doing Nothing – Java License Risk if Trends Continue
In software licensing, doing nothing can be the most costly option.
With Oracle Java, staying passive won’t keep your spending flat—it will ramp it up. If you simply accept Oracle’s changes without a plan, your Java costs could spiral in the coming years.
Let’s look at what the next five years might bring if you take no action. Spoiler: it’s not pretty for your budget or flexibility.
Pro Tip: “The most expensive Java strategy is the one with no strategy.”
For a full overview of the future, read our strategic guide, Oracle Java Future Outlook & Strategy (2025–2030).
How Java Got Here
How did we end up here? Oracle’s new Java licensing model (launched in 2023) flipped a developer tool into a major line-item cost. Instead of paying per server or per user, Oracle now charges per employee across the entire company.
If even one team uses Oracle’s Java, you’re expected to license every employee on payroll. A simple Java deployment suddenly became a company-wide subscription.
Since that change, prices have only climbed, and compliance pressures have tightened. Many organizations saw their Java costs jump 2×, 5×,× or more under the per-employee plan.
Oracle’s auditors have also been unusually active, checking whether companies are paying for all employees. Even smaller firms (hundreds of staff) have found themselves on Oracle’s audit radar. Oracle is squeezing every bit of revenue from Java.
Yet many companies still haven’t reacted. They’re hoping these changes were a one-off and things will stabilize. Spoiler: they won’t.
Oracle isn’t done changing the rules to its advantage. In fact, all signs point to Oracle pushing this even further in the future. Betting on “things will go back to normal” is not a safe bet here.
What are our predictions for OpenJDK? – OpenJDK Ecosystem and Future – How It Impacts Oracle.
What “Doing Nothing” Really Means
When it comes to Java licensing, doing nothing is essentially the same as saying “yes” to Oracle by default.
In practice, staying passive means:
- Auto-renewing on Oracle’s terms: You let your Java subscription renew each year without negotiating, accepting whatever pricing Oracle sets.
- Not tracking growth: You ignore changes in employee count or Java usage. If your company hires more people, you’ll unknowingly owe more for Java (and probably won’t realize it until the bill arrives).
- Ignoring alternatives: You stick your head in the sand when it comes to OpenJDK or third-party Java options. You assume Oracle’s Java is the only way, so you make no effort to evaluate free or cheaper alternatives.
- Waiting for Oracle’s call: You don’t take action until Oracle contacts you – often in the form of an audit notice or a sales push. Essentially, you give up all initiative and wait to be told (or forced) to do something.
Each of these non-decisions quietly increases your future exposure. By doing nothing, you’re effectively consenting to Oracle’s evolving terms without any pushback.
Pro Tip: “In Oracle’s world, silence equals consent.”
The 5-Year Cost Curve
What does “doing nothing” look like on the balance sheet? Let’s illustrate it. Consider an enterprise with 10,000 employees that stays on Oracle’s Java plan through 2030 with no changes.
Here’s an estimated cost trajectory:
| Year | Estimated Annual Cost | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.2 M | Current per-employee subscription |
| 2026 | $1.35 M | Price inflation, no renegotiation |
| 2027 | $1.55 M | Oracle adds new pricing tier |
| 2028 | $1.75 M | Employee growth + compliance fee |
| 2029–2030 | $2.0 M+ | Hybrid or cloud-linked model |
Over five years, the annual Java bill jumps roughly 60–70%. And all that extra spending buys the company nothing new – it’s purely the price of staying on autopilot. This is the cost of doing nothing compounded year after year.
Pro Tip: “Oracle doesn’t charge for what you use. It charges for what you don’t question.”
Will Oracle change its mind again? – Will Oracle Ever Make Java Free Again?.
Risk Beyond Cost – The Compliance Trap
Financial costs aren’t the only dangers of inaction. You’re also sliding into a compliance trap. Here’s how doing nothing increases your risk:
- Higher audit risk: Oracle loves easy targets. A company that passively renews and doesn’t closely manage usage is a prime candidate for a surprise audit. Stagnant accounts – those not actively managing their licenses – draw Oracle’s attention.
- True-up surprises: Under the per-employee model, any growth in headcount means you owe more. If your workforce grows and you’re not tracking it, you could face a hefty true-up bill at renewal. Inaction means you’ll always be playing catch-up with your license count.
- Renewal pressure: Walking into a renewal unprepared is exactly what Oracle hopes you’ll do. If you haven’t gathered data on who actually uses Java or explored other options, you have zero leverage. Oracle’s team will simply dictate terms, and you’ll have little choice but to accept whatever price increase or conditions they impose.
- Contract lock-in: Many Oracle Java contracts include auto-renewal or tricky cancellation clauses. If you’re not paying attention, you’ll miss the narrow opt-out windows. “Doing nothing” can inadvertently roll you into another year (or more) of commitment without realizing it. The longer you coast, the harder it becomes to pull out of Oracle’s grip.
In short, the more time that passes, the more tangled you become in Oracle’s web. The fewer proactive moves you make, the fewer options you’ll have to escape later on.
Operational Risks
Ignoring Oracle Java licensing doesn’t just hurt your wallet or legal standing – it can wreak havoc on IT operations too:
- Untracked deployments: If you haven’t audited where Java is used, there are likely Oracle JDK installations in your environment that nobody officially knows about. Each unknown install is a ticking time bomb for compliance. Lack of documentation is exactly where audit risk hides.
- Outdated versions: Inaction often means sticking with whatever Java version you have. Over time, those versions fall out of support. Running an old version of Java (without updates because you have no subscription or plan) creates security gaps in your systems. You’re exposing your organization to potential vulnerabilities.
- No governance: Without policies, developers and admins might download and use Oracle Java arbitrarily. One team grabs the latest Oracle JDK for a project, another spins up a server with it – all outside any formal tracking. This uncontrolled use will compound, making it harder to ever achieve compliance or optimize costs. It’s IT chaos waiting to happen.
- Knowledge loss: Maybe you had one licensing expert on staff who understood Oracle’s Java rules. What if they leave? If you haven’t institutionalized that knowledge (say, via documentation and process), you’re back to square one. New staff might be completely unaware of the Java licensing minefield and inadvertently put you in violation.
All these operational missteps feed into each other. Untracked installs lead to unsupported versions; a lack of governance leads to more untracked installs; a loss of expertise leads to a lack of governance, and so on.
The result is not just technical debt, but licensing debt—an accumulation of risk that will eventually come due, likely at the worst time.
Checklist – Signs You’re Falling Behind
How can you tell if your organization is slipping into a Java licensing hole? Do a quick self-check. If any of the following are true, you may be behind the curve:
✅ No clear Java inventory: You don’t know exactly where different Java versions (Oracle or otherwise) are running in your estate.
✅ Unsynced HR and IT data: Your HR headcount isn’t actively reconciled with your Java license counts. (If HR grows by 10%, do you realize your Java bill will too?)
✅ Renewals in a silo: Java renewals are treated as a pure finance task, with little input from IT or asset management. (In other words, checks get signed blindly.)
✅ No OpenJDK plan: You haven’t evaluated what it would take to move some or all Java workloads to OpenJDK or another free distribution.
✅ Assuming flat pricing: You just assume Oracle’s Java price will remain roughly the same each year and haven’t modeled any increases or changes.
If even a couple of these points ring true, your risk trend is upward. You’re essentially sailing blind into waters where Oracle sets the traps. It’s time to course-correct before you hit one.
What Proactive Companies Are Doing
Not everyone is in denial. Many smart enterprises have already sprung into action to avoid the Java licensing squeeze.
Here’s what proactive organizations are doing right now:
- Running a full Java audit: They start by identifying every instance of Java in their environment. You can’t manage what you don’t know about. An accurate inventory of Java installations (and their versions) is step one.
- Separating Oracle vs. OpenJDK: Not all Java is equal under the licensing umbrella. Proactive teams distinguish where they’re using Oracle’s Java (which requires a license) from open-source Java, such as OpenJDK or other vendor builds. This segmentation highlights opportunities to reduce Oracle usage.
- Data-backed negotiations: Going into Oracle discussions armed with data. If they know they only truly need Oracle’s Java for, say, 1,000 out of 10,000 employees (because the rest could run on OpenJDK), they use that info. They push for pricing based on actual need, or they negotiate exceptions. Basically, they don’t simply accept Oracle’s headcount number – they challenge it with evidence.
- Migrating where it’s safe: Many companies are actively migrating non-critical or easily portable applications off Oracle Java to alternative JDKs. Databases, internal apps, anything that can run on OpenJDK or a free Java build – they’re making that switch to cut reliance on Oracle. Even if they keep Oracle Java for mission-critical systems (for support reasons), they trim the fat elsewhere.
- Building internal controls: Proactive organizations establish governance to prevent the problem from recurring. They might restrict who can download Oracle Java, enforce the use of approved Java versions, and train teams about the licensing implications. By controlling how Java enters and spreads in the environment, they prevent accidental non-compliance from popping up.
In short, these companies refuse to be sitting ducks. They’re not reacting to Oracle’s moves after the fact – they’re anticipating them. By taking inventory, exploring alternatives, and negotiating early, they put themselves in the driver’s seat. The difference in outcomes between this approach and a passive one is enormous.
Pro Tip: “The difference between proactive and reactive? Millions.”
The Future Outlook if Nothing Changes
What happens if the industry as a whole just shrugs and accepts Oracle’s Java policies? You can bet Oracle will keep pushing the envelope. If everyone stays passive, Oracle will likely expand the scope (and cost) of Java licensing even further.
We could see developments like:
- Counting more than people: Today it’s “per employee.” Tomorrow, Oracle might decide to count devices, virtual machines, or even applications running Java. The metric could be broadened so you end up paying for every touchpoint Java has in your organization, not just employees.
- Fewer free passes: Oracle’s willingness to offer “free” Java versions (like the temporary free use of certain LTS versions) could dwindle. They might shorten free-update periods or eliminate free developer-use clauses. Over time, expect that any loophole allowing free use will narrow or close.
- Smarter, stealthier audits: Oracle’s audit tactics will only get more sophisticated. Don’t be surprised if they deploy automated discovery tools or even AI to sniff out unlicensed Java usage in companies. It could get easier for Oracle to find that one forgotten server running Oracle Java and use it as leverage to bill you.
- Java tied to everything: Oracle might bundle Java with its other offerings in a way that’s hard to untangle. For example, future Java renewal might come packaged with an Oracle Cloud service requirement. Or Java licenses might start covering (and charging for) other Oracle software usage by combining metrics. The result? Even less flexibility – you pay Oracle for Java, and you’re nudged to pay them for other things too.
If these trends continue, by 2030, Java could feel less like a technology license and more like a subscription tax. You wouldn’t think of it as “we’re paying for Java support” so much as “we have to pay this fee to keep our Java-based business running, period.”
That’s a grim outlook, but it’s where things could head if no one pushes back.
The Smart Path Forward
The good news: you can avoid that grim future if you act intentionally. Doing nothing is a choice – but so is taking control.
Here’s the smart path forward to mitigate Java licensing risk:
1️⃣ Audit your Java estate now. Know exactly where and how Java is used in your organization. This means every server, application, and workstation. Determine which of those are using Oracle’s JDK versus open-source versions. You need a clear starting point.
2️⃣ Model your total Java cost through 2030. Don’t just think about this year’s subscription fee. Project the cost 5+ years out if you change nothing – include assumed Oracle price hikes and your company growth. Then model alternative scenarios (e.g., if you reduce Oracle Java usage by X%). Seeing the long-term curve in advance builds the case for action today.
3️⃣ Explore OpenJDK and other builds. There are free or cheaper Java alternatives (OpenJDK, Eclipse Temurin, Amazon Corretto, Azul Zulu, and more). Investigate compatibility with your applications. Many organizations find that non-Oracle JDKs work just fine. You can also consider third-party support for OpenJDK if you need the safety net. The goal isn’t necessarily to drop Oracle entirely (though some do), but to understand your options beyond writing Oracle a blank check.
4️⃣ Establish Java governance. Put internal policies in place to control Java usage. For example, prevent teams from downloading Oracle JDK on a whim – maybe set up an internal repository of approved Java builds. Define which Java versions are standard for new projects. This governance will stop inadvertent sprawl and keep you aware of changes that could trigger licensing issues.
5️⃣ Negotiate proactively (and early). If you are going to stay with Oracle Java in some capacity, engage Oracle on your terms. Don’t wait for the renewal notice or, worse, an audit letter. Reach out 6–12 months before renewal with your data in hand. If Oracle knows you’re considering leaving (and have the numbers to back it up), you’d be surprised how much more flexible they can become. The worst time to negotiate is when they’ve caught you off guard – so don’t let that happen.
By taking these steps, you redirect the pressure. Oracle will still want its revenue, but you’ll have a plan and leverage to push back or minimize the impact. You’re no longer a passive target.
Final Take
The cost of doing nothing about Oracle Java isn’t zero – it’s compounding. Every quarter you remain passive, your risk and potential costs grow. Inaction might feel easier today, but it’s piling up a future bill (and headache) that your organization will have to pay.
If you want predictable Java costs and avoid nasty surprises by 2030, the time to act is now —2025.
That means assessing your usage, exploring alternatives, and engaging Oracle with knowledge. Waiting and hoping for the best is exactly what Oracle wants you to do, because it works in their favor – and it will cost you.
Don’t pay for inaction. Make a plan, take control, and turn this looming expense into a manageable strategy. In the world of Oracle Java, the only truly expensive move is no move at all.
Pro Tip: “Waiting for Oracle to change is the same as paying for it to happen.”
Read about our Java Advisory Services
