Oracle JDK vs OpenJDK – Alternatives to Oracle Java

Oracle JDK vs OpenJDK – Alternatives to Oracle Java

Most enterprises ran Oracle’s Java for years without a second thought. It was the default choice. For a long time, Oracle’s JDK had no direct cost. That era is over – Oracle now requires a paid subscription for commercial Java use, which has changed the calculus.

Today, the runtime decision is more about cost, license model, and vendor lock-in. You need to compare what you’re paying versus what you’re getting. It’s a question many companies are now asking themselves.

Pro Tip: Don’t confuse the runtime with the risk.

Feature Parity – Same Code-base, Different License

Oracle JDK and OpenJDK share the same core code. In fact, they are almost identical under the hood. Oracle’s JDK is built from the OpenJDK project. The main difference is in the license and a few add-ons.

Oracle bundles a few commercial extras with its JDK. These might include advanced monitoring tools or management consoles. Most enterprise applications don’t rely on these extras. They focus on standard Java features available in any JDK.

In practice, switching from Oracle JDK to OpenJDK usually doesn’t break your applications. The functionality that runs your business logic remains the same.

Any exclusive Oracle features tend to be non-essential or have open-source alternatives. For example, Oracle’s Java Flight Recorder was once exclusive but is now open to the community.

The bottom line: feature parity is a non-issue for the vast majority of use cases. You won’t lose core capabilities by going open source.

Cost & Support Comparison

Cost is where Oracle JDK and OpenJDK diverge sharply. Oracle JDK requires a paid subscription. As of recent licensing changes, Oracle charges based on total employees, not just Java users. This means you pay for every employee in your organization, even if only some use Java. That can get very expensive, very fast.

OpenJDK has no license fee. It’s free to use, even in production. You can download it and run it without cutting a check. Support for OpenJDK comes in two flavors: community help or third-party vendors.

Community support (forums, user groups) costs nothing but relies on best-effort help. Paid support from vendors (such as Red Hat or Azul) costs extra but is usually far less than Oracle’s rates.

To illustrate the difference, consider a mid-sized company with 500 employees. Oracle’s subscription might be around $15 per employee per month. That’s roughly $7,500 per month, or $90,000 per year. Over five years, you’re looking at nearly $450,000 spent on Java licenses and support. Now compare that to OpenJDK. The same company would pay $0 in license fees.

Even if they invest in a third-party support contract for $50,000 per year, that’s $250,000 over five years. The open-source route could roughly halve your Java runtime TCO. If only a small fraction of those 500 employees actually use Java, the savings grow even more — Oracle’s model makes you pay for headcount, not actual usage.

Oracle does offer 24/7 official support and regular updates as part of its subscription. With OpenJDK, updates are also available (the OpenJDK community and vendors release security patches on similar schedules).

In fact, critical patches often arrive in OpenJDK builds at almost the same time as Oracle’s, so you won’t be left behind on security. The difference is who you call for help.

Oracle’s support might suit companies that want one throat to choke—a single vendor accountable. Third-party support can be just as enterprise-grade, often with more flexible terms.

Audit risk is another consideration. Using Oracle JDK without proper licensing can lead to compliance audits and penalties. Oracle is known for strict license audits. OpenJDK usage avoids that risk entirely. There’s no Oracle license to comply with when you go open source. That peace of mind is hard to quantify but very real.

Pro Tip: If you’re paying per head and only a few people use Java, you’re overpaying.

Operational Considerations – Migrating to OpenJDK

Migrating from Oracle JDK to OpenJDK is usually straightforward. The underlying Java runtime is the same. Still, an orderly plan will make the transition smoother and safer.

First, test your applications on OpenJDK in a lower environment. Most likely, everything will run as usual. Validate that critical apps behave the same. Check that your build pipelines and tools work with OpenJDK. Often it’s as simple as pointing your systems to the new JDK and running your test suites.

Plan the rollout in stages. Start with development and test environments using OpenJDK. Next, do a pilot deployment for one or two non-critical production applications. Monitor performance and stability. This phased approach builds confidence. Once you see that things are stable, proceed to enterprise-wide rollout. Replace Oracle JDK on servers and desktops systematically. Finally, decommission the Oracle JDK from your environment to avoid confusion and any accidental usage.

Have a rollback plan just in case. Maybe keep Oracle JDK installed in parallel until you’re fully comfortable. If something unexpected happens, you can temporarily switch back while you troubleshoot. In practice, rollback is rarely needed, but it’s good governance to have that safety net.

Training and communication are part of the migration. Ensure your IT staff is aware of the new Java distribution. They might need minor adjustments (like different update procedures or tool paths), but these are minimal. The core Java commands and behaviors remain the same.

By approaching migration methodically, you minimize risk. Many companies find that the hardest part is just overcoming the inertia of the status quo. Once they test OpenJDK and see it works, moving forward becomes much easier.

Pro Tip: It costs nothing to pilot OpenJDK on a test system. Try it early to build confidence before a full switch.

Other Alternatives to Consider

• Azul Zulu (Vendor-supported OpenJDK): Azul Zulu is a free OpenJDK distribution with paid support available. Pricing is moderate (per server/core, not per employee). Best for professional support at a fraction of Oracle’s cost.
  Pricing is moderate (per server/core, not per employee).
  Best for professional support at a fraction of Oracle’s cost.
• Amazon Corretto: Amazon’s free OpenJDK build with regular security updates. No direct support (unless you’re on AWS). Best when you want to cut Java licensing costs yet still get timely updates.
  No direct support (unless you’re on AWS).
  Best when you want to cut Java licensing costs yet still get timely updates.
• Red Hat OpenJDK: Red Hat’s OpenJDK comes with Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Support is included in a Red Hat subscription (or as an add-on). Ideal if you’re a Red Hat shop and want one vendor for OS and Java.
  Support is included in a Red Hat subscription (or as an add-on).
  Ideal if you’re a Red Hat shop and want one vendor for OS and Java.
• IBM Semeru (OpenJ9): IBM’s OpenJDK distribution. It’s free with optional support. Best for IBM-centric environments or special performance needs. Not a common pick when leaving Oracle, but still an option.
  It’s free with optional support.
  Best for IBM-centric environments or special performance needs.
  Not a common pick when leaving Oracle, but still an option.

Pros & Cons Table

Here’s a quick side-by-side comparison of Oracle JDK, community OpenJDK, and a vendor-supported OpenJDK option:

Pro Tip: Switching isn’t about rewriting code — it’s about rewriting cost.

Recommendation Framework – Stay or Switch?

Not sure which path to take? Consider these guidelines to make a decision:

Stay with Oracle if…

• Your systems rely on an Oracle-only Java feature or a specific certified integration that only Oracle JDK guarantees.
• Your organization has zero tolerance for any change or risk, and the cost is not a primary concern compared to stability. If even a small uncertainty outweighs big savings, sticking with Oracle might be your comfort zone.

Switch from Oracle if…

• You want to significantly cut down Java licensing costs and reduce audit/compliance worries.
• Your applications use standard Java APIs and features that don’t require Oracle-specific add-ons.
• You are moving towards cloud or containerized deployments and need more flexibility. (Oracle’s licensing can be problematic in dynamic cloud environments, whereas OpenJDK lets you scale freely.)

Many enterprises will find they fall in the “switch” category once they do the homework. If you’re paying a large bill for Java and not using anything exclusive to Oracle, it’s a strong signal to consider alternatives.

A hybrid approach is also an option. You might keep Oracle JDK for a specific system that truly demands it (if any), and use OpenJDK for everything else. This way, you minimize cost while still meeting any niche requirements.

Migration Readiness Checklist

Ready to make the move? Use this checklist to prepare for a smooth migration:

• ✅ Map all Java installations: Identify where Oracle JDK is installed across your environments (servers, VMs, developer machines).
• ✅ Identify Oracle-only dependencies: Check if any application strictly requires an Oracle JDK feature or has hard-coded paths to Oracle tools.
• ✅ Compare 5-year costs: Build a model of total cost over the next five years for staying with Oracle versus switching to OpenJDK (include potential support contracts).
• ✅ Run an OpenJDK pilot: Select a test group of applications or servers and roll out OpenJDK. Monitor results and gather any issues.
• ✅ Align with contract timelines: Plan the switch around your Oracle Java renewal dates. Avoid signing a long renewal if you intend to migrate soon.
• ✅ Line up support for the new JDK: If you need a support vendor for OpenJDK, negotiate and have that ready. Ensure your team knows how to get help under the new model.

This checklist ensures you cover both technical and commercial bases before leaping.

Related articles.

• Oracle Java vs Azul Platform – Cost & Risk Comparison
• Oracle Java vs Amazon Corretto – Cost, Support & Fit
• Frequently Asked Questions – Oracle Java vs OpenJDK
• Performance Benchmark – Oracle JDK vs OpenJDK

Final Words

Choosing the right Java runtime is more than a technical decision – it’s a strategic business move. The Java code powering your applications will run fine on either Oracle JDK or OpenJDK. What differs is how much you pay and the strings attached.

The key is to ensure your next Java renewal (or migration) aligns with your actual needs, not the vendor’s revenue model. Don’t pay for an entire company’s headcount if only a handful of servers actually need Java. Don’t let legacy habits dictate a modern solution.

In many cases, the safest choice is the one that gives you control and flexibility. Whether that means staying with Oracle for a specific need or embracing OpenJDK to save costs, it should be a conscious choice.

Remember, doing nothing (sticking with the status quo) is also a decision—and potentially an expensive one. A little due diligence now to explore your options can pay off in major cost savings and fewer compliance worries later.

Pro Tip: Don’t let the vendor licence your headcount. License what you actually run.

Read about our Java Advisory Services

Do you want to know more about our Java Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit