Building an Internal Business Case for Java Alternatives
In this guide, we turn to the practical plan: building a credible internal business case to migrate away from Oracle Java to alternatives like OpenJDK.
Oracle’s Java renewal in 2025 is shaping up to be the most expensive yet. If your organization finds Oracle’s high Java fees unjustifiable, then you must justify walking away — with hard data, not emotion.
This guide shows how to present that case clearly to your executives, proving that moving away from Oracle Java is a pragmatic, financially sound strategy, not a reckless gamble.
Pro Tip: “Your strongest argument isn’t technical — it’s financial predictability.”
For a strategic angle, read our Oracle Java Licensing Negotiation & Renewal Guide.
Step 1 – Define the Business Problem
Start by framing the Java renewal issue in business terms, not as an IT complaint. Oracle’s recent pricing changes have turned a once minor IT line item (Java runtime licenses) into a significant recurring cost. Many organizations are seeing renewal quotes that double or even triple their previous Java spend, yet without any additional value – it’s the same Java. At the same time, actual usage often lags far behind what’s licensed, meaning we’re over-licensed and under-utilized.
One effective positioning statement is: “We’re over-licensed, under-utilized, and now over-charged — there’s a better way.” This captures the essence of the issue in plain language for executives. It shifts the discussion from technical nuance to a clear business problem of wasteful spending.
Pro Tip: “Executives don’t approve migrations; they approve risk reduction.”
Read some insights on “Hard Truths” of Oracle Java Negotiation.
Step 2 – Quantify the Cost Gap
Next, focus on the dollars and cents. Prepare a 3-year cost comparison for three scenarios: staying on Oracle Java, migrating completely to OpenJDK, or a hybrid of the two. For example, for an organization with 10,000 employees:
| Option | Metric (Coverage) | 3-Year Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle Java Universal Subscription | Employee-based (10k staff) | $3.6 M | List price × 36 months |
| OpenJDK (Adoptium/Azul/Corretto) | No license fees; optional support | $0.6–1.2 M | Depending on support tier |
| Hybrid Model (Oracle + OpenJDK) | 30% Oracle / 70% OpenJDK | ~$1.8 M | Balance of risk and cost |
In this illustrative model, Oracle’s proposed subscription would cost roughly $3.6 million over three years at list prices. By contrast, migrating fully to OpenJDK could bring that down to perhaps $600k–$1.2 million (mostly for third-party support, since OpenJDK itself has no licensing fee). Even a balanced hybrid approach (say 30% of Java workloads stay on Oracle, 70% move to OpenJDK) might cost around $1.8 million over three years.
The takeaway is clear: the cost difference is dramatic. A full OpenJDK migration shows roughly 70–80% savings, and even a cautious hybrid strategy can cut Java costs by about half.
Pro Tip: “Every $1 saved on Java is $1 available for modernization.”
Step 3 – Map the Business Benefits
Cost savings alone get attention, but executives ultimately approve migrations for the business benefits and risk mitigation. This means translating the technical move (switching Java platforms) into strategic gains. Lay out the key benefits of migrating away from Oracle Java, and spell out the business impact of each. For example:
| Benefit | Description | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Reduction | 60–80% lower annual Java spend | Direct reduction in operating costs (OPEX) |
| Vendor Independence | Removes Oracle lock-in | Improved negotiation leverage and freedom to choose vendors |
| Flexibility | Multiple OpenJDK vendors & support models | No single-vendor dependency; ability to mix and match support as needed |
| Predictability | No surprise pricing changes or audits | Stable multi-year budget forecasting with no fear of sudden cost spikes |
| Compliance Control | Eliminates Oracle Java licensing | Zero risk of Oracle license audits (see Pillar 4: Oracle Java Audits & Enforcement) and simplified compliance |
These benefits are commercial, not ideological. Cutting Java costs by 60–80% directly improves the bottom line. Removing Oracle lock-in gives you leverage in future vendor negotiations. Multiple support options mean no single point of failure. Eliminating Oracle Java licenses eliminates the Java audit risk entirely.
Pro Tip: “Cost wins headlines — stability wins approvals.”
Step 4 – Present the Migration Plan & Timeline
With the “why” established, you must show how the migration will happen. Executives will want to know that moving from Oracle Java to OpenJDK (or another alternative) is a manageable project, not a chaotic leap. Present a high-level timeline that demonstrates a structured approach. For example, a 12-month migration plan might look like:
- Q1–Q2: Inventory all Java applications and dependencies.
- Q2–Q3: Pilot OpenJDK on non-critical systems and refine processes.
- Q3–Q4: Migrate critical production workloads to OpenJDK (phased rollout) and validate support.
- Q4 (end): Terminate Oracle Java licenses and optimize any remaining issues.
Note that the migration project itself might cost only ~20% of what one year of Oracle’s subscription would have been. And that one-time investment is typically recouped within the first year by the subscription fees you avoid.
Presenting a concrete roadmap reassures leadership that this is a controlled project, not a risky jump into the unknown. It shows the plan is phased, time-bound, and fully under control.
Pro Tip: “Executives approve clarity, not chaos — show the roadmap.”
Read our Java negotiation tips, Oracle Java Negotiation Tips – The Essential Dos and Don’ts.
Step 5 – Address Risk Head-On
No matter how compelling the cost savings, prudent executives will zero in on risks. As soon as you propose leaving Oracle, someone will ask, “What could go wrong?” Address these concerns head-on with a clear risk matrix:
| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Compatibility issues (older apps) | Low | Test apps on OpenJDK LTS versions (e.g. Java 17–21) before cutover; resolve any library differences ahead of time. |
| Security patch delays | Low | Use a supported OpenJDK provider (e.g. Azul or Red Hat) that releases security patches as fast as Oracle. |
| Vendor accountability | Medium | Sign an OpenJDK support contract with SLAs (so you have a vendor to call for any issues). |
| Internal skills gap | Medium | Run pilot projects and training to build the team’s OpenJDK expertise before full migration. |
| Audit/transition risk | Low | Document all Oracle Java retirements and formally terminate those licenses to eliminate audit exposure. |
Covering these risks (and mitigations) upfront shows that you’re managing potential issues, not sweeping them under the rug. It gives executives confidence that the challenges of OpenJDK are understood and can be handled with proper planning.
Pro Tip: “Risk isn’t a reason to stay — it’s a reason to plan properly.”
Step 6 – Craft the Executive Pitch
At this stage, you have all the components of the case: the problem, the numbers, the benefits, the plan, and the risk handling. Now distill it into a crisp executive pitch. Senior leadership is busy, so you should be able to summarize the proposal in a few punchy points. For example:
- Oracle’s Java pricing has outpaced the value we get – we’re facing a huge cost increase for the same software.
- Viable Java alternatives can slash costs and eliminate risk – OpenJDK (and others) can reduce spend and remove Oracle dependency without loss of functionality.
- We have a clear migration plan – switching in the next 12 months is feasible, and it will pay for itself within the first year.
Each point hits a key concern: cost, risk, and execution. This becomes the core message in your executive briefing or slide deck.
Support these points with a few key exhibits:
- Cost-benefit analysis: a visual chart comparing Oracle vs OpenJDK costs to reinforce the savings.
- Risk summary: a one-page version of the risk matrix to prove due diligence on “what could go wrong.”
- Timeline: a high-level graphic of the migration schedule to show the plan is time-bound and realistic.
These backup materials let decision-makers drill into details if they want, while keeping your core pitch succinct.
Importantly, frame the proposal in positive terms. It’s not about fleeing Oracle; it’s about regaining control of your IT strategy and costs. This subtle reframing makes the plan sound like a proactive strategic move (which it is), rather than a reactionary measure.
Pro Tip: “Never present it as ‘leaving Oracle’ — present it as ‘regaining control.’”
Checklist – Core Components of Your Business Case
Before you finalize your internal proposal, make sure all the critical components are in place. Use this checklist to ensure your business case is boardroom-ready:
- ✅ Executive Summary: A concise one-slide overview of the proposal.
- ✅ Cost Comparison & ROI: Data contrasting Oracle’s cost vs. the alternative, and the projected savings/ROI.
- ✅ Migration Plan & Timeline: Outline of how and when the transition will happen.
- ✅ Risk Matrix: Major risks and how each will be mitigated.
- ✅ Stakeholder Buy-In: Proof that key IT, security, and finance stakeholders support the plan.
Having these elements covered will preempt the typical questions executives might ask. It shows that the proposal isn’t just a knee-jerk cost cut, but a well-thought-out plan vetted by all the right players.
Pro Tip: “Approvals follow structure — show you’ve done the math and the risk analysis.”
Step 7 – Keep Negotiation Optional
Even as you build momentum for an OpenJDK migration, remember that this Plan B can also strengthen your Plan A (staying with Oracle on better terms). By developing a credible alternative, you automatically improve your negotiating position with Oracle.
Maintain OpenJDK evaluation and pilot work as a real contingency. In discussions with Oracle, you can mention that the company is exploring Java alternatives (without making any ultimatum). The mere fact that Oracle knows you have a fallback puts pressure on them.
The key is credibility. If Oracle sees your OpenJDK plan is real and moving forward, they know you can actually walk away. That’s when their pricing suddenly becomes more flexible. In short, having a genuine Plan B in motion gives you leverage to get a better deal from Oracle.
Pro Tip: “A real Plan B makes Plan A cheaper.”
The Outcome – Leverage Through Options
By building a strong internal business case for Java alternatives, you win back leverage. Whether you fully migrate or simply use the option as negotiating power, Oracle loses its stranglehold on your Java budget.
If your leadership approves the migration, you’ll achieve huge cost savings, independence from Oracle, and freedom from Java audits. And if Oracle suddenly offers a better deal, it will be because you had a credible alternative ready to go.
Either way, your organization is no longer stuck accepting Oracle’s terms. You’ve transformed an overpriced renewal into an opportunity to save money and improve your IT strategy. And beyond Java, you’ve set a precedent that your team will proactively manage vendor costs instead of being dictated to.
Pro Tip: “Choice is leverage. Use it.”
Read about our Java Advisory Services
